Saturday, December 10, 2011

ASSESSING INTELLIGENCE

I personally feel that there is no one way to assess a child.  In order to get a full and accurate assessment a child should be assessed in every area of development.  When one think about it, in order to understand a child you have to look at every aspect of the child's life, and I feel it should be the same when assessing a child.   In order to get a full understanding of the child's development and intelligence we must examine all areas of biosocial, cognitive, as well as psychosocial development.  I think it is unfair for a child who has been reading the English language for a minimal amount of time to be measured on the same scale as a child who has always read the language. 

ASSESSING INTELLIGENCE IN CHINA

The children in China are faced with the same dilemma as the American children with the standardized tests.  In China the three major purposes for assessment is
  • assessment as improvement of teaching and learning
  • assessment as making schools and teachers accountable for their effectiveness
  • assessments as making students accountable for their learning
In China the primary schools test in the areas of mathematics and Chinese language. Both Hong Kong and China have long traditions of high-stakes examinations to select students for limited spots in higher levels of education or in higher rated educational institutions.  
Regardless of which culture, I feel it is inappropriate for children to be assessed using standardized testing as the only tool.  Some children are very intelligent but have a difficult time with testing.  Also during test time a child may be having problems at home, feeling ill, and the atmosphere of the testing room may be uncomfortable, who knows.  Know one, so if all of things are not taking into accountability I think the test results inaccurate.

Reference:
http://auckland.academia.edu/GavinBrown/Papers/1042771/Teachers_Conceptions_of_Assessment_in_Chinese_Contexts_A_Tripartite_Model_of_Accountability_Improvement_and_Irrelevance

4 comments:

  1. Hi Nashika! You have made valid points that I never even considered. So many factors can contribute how assessments measure a child's achievement. Any thing from "the child's home environment to the testing room being uncomfortable" can be factors that are overlooked by teachers and test administrators.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Nashika.

    Your comment about testing a child who has had minimal exposure to the English language is unfair. You are so very right! How can a child be accurately tested when they are no where near familiar with an unknown language?

    I can agree with you on the factors that affect testing. When I was required to give benchmarks while teaching 3rd grade, I could tell what type of day certain students of mine were having by their test score. Usually, it was something that happened at home before they came to school. It is just unfortunate that students have to take the standardized assessments. As you said, a child can be very intelligent, but have difficulty with testing. I can attest to that - my daughter will freeze up on assessments. What is even scarier is now, for the state of Texas, the STARR test is timed. Students only get 4 hours to take the rigorous exam. How unfair is that? Some students need more processing time!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that most standardized tests are unfair because they can keep a student from passing when they are perfectly capable of doing so. Some children just have a bad day, are sick, family trouble, or are tired on the day of the test. How do we factor that in?

    ReplyDelete